Entangled Minds sets the stage for a rational, scientific understanding of psychic experience. He reveals the physical reality behind our uncanny telepathic experiences and intuitive hunches, and he debunks the skeptical myths surrounding them. Radin surveys the origins of this research and explores, among many topics, the collective premonitions of 9/11. In this illuminating book, Radin shows how we know that psychic phenomena such as telepathy, clairvoyance, and psychokinesis are real, based on scientific evidence from thousands of controlled lab tests.

Could a similar entanglement of minds explain our apparent psychic abilities? Dean Radin, senior scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, believes it might. But the latest scientific research shows that these phenomena are both real and widespread, and are an unavoidable consequence of the interconnected, entangled physical reality we live in.Īlbert Einstein called entanglement 'spooky action at a distance'-the way two objects remain connected through time and space, without communicating in any conventional way, long after their initial interaction has taken place. Many people believe that such 'psychic phenomena' are rare talents or divine gifts. Product Details About the Author Read an Excerpt. Radin’s claims here, one may wish to seek further details of the meta-analysis.Is everything connected? Can we sense what's happening to loved ones thousands of miles away? Why are we sometimes certain of a caller's identity the instant the phone rings? Do intuitive hunches contain information about future events? Is it possible to perceive without the use of the ordinary senses? Entangled Minds sets the stage for a rational, scientific understanding of psychic experience. I perused the book but could find no citation that might lead me to more description.īefore one relies upon Dr. Why would the average year of publication be plotted on the x-axis? What range of years were used for each average? Entangled Minds by Dean Radin - Ebook Scribd Enjoy millions of ebooks, audiobooks, magazines, and more, with a free trial Only 11.99/month after trial. The first sentence seems direct and plausible: “Cumulative average hit rate in the ganzfeld experiments, from 1974 through 2004, with one standard error bar.”īut the third sentence reads: “Each dot represents an experiment and the dates on the x-axis indicate the average year of study publication.” Can these two sentences be reconciled? It seems unlikely that each dot represents one experiment (the variance of the hit rates would be remarkably small).

Figure 6-6 on page 120 has a graph of the results. Dean Radin discusses a meta-analysis of 88 ganzfeld experiments in his book Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality (Paraview, 2006).

Entangled minds by dean radin